State Of Andhra Pradesh (Now State Of Telangana) vs A. P. State Wakf Board

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(SC) 132

HEMANT GUPTA, V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN
State Of Andhra Pradesh (Now State Of Telangana) – Appellant
Versus
A. P. State Wakf Board – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Parties(s) :V. Giri, P. Venkat Reddy, Prashant Kumar Tyagi, P. Srinivas Reddy, Ms. Ankita Gupta, M/S. Venkat Palwai Law Associates, Huzefa A. Ahmadi, Nakul Dewan, Ejaz Maqbool, Ms. Akriti Chaubey, Saif Zia, Ms. Shahrukh Alam, Rohan Sharma, Rohan Andrew Naik, Ms. Smriti Kalra, Abu Akram, Ms. Tanya Shree, C.S. Vaidyanathan, Ms. Bina Madhavan, Sweena Nair, P. Mohith Rao, S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Salman Khurshid, S. Wasim A. Qadri, Lakshmi Raman Singh, . Tamim A. Qadri, Saeed Qadri, Ms. Lubna Naaz, Aman Khullar, Ms. Shama Usmani, Randeep Rai, Abhinav Agnihotri, Dipan Sethi, Ms. Rubina Virmani, Sunil Fernandes, Basavaprabhu S. Patil, Anirudh Sanganeria, Vikas Mehta, Adith Nair, Apoorv Khator, Bhaskar Nayak, V. Prabhakar, Rajat Sehgal, Ms. Jyoti Parashar, N.J. Ramchandra, Francis Ilango, Ranjit Kumar, Deepak Khurana, Ms. Nishtha Wadhawa, Umesh Kumar Khaitan, Anoop Chaudhary, Varinder Kumar Sharma, Varun Thakur, Ms. Parul Sharma, Bikash Chandra, Brijesh Pandey, Salman Khan, Yugal Prasad, P.K. Singh, Ms. Shraddha Saran, Shantanu Sharma, Ashish Dholakia, Akash Panwal, P.S. Sudheer, Bharat Sood, Ms. Shruti Jose, Santanam Swaminadhan, Hirendranath, Ms. Abhilasha Shrawat, Prakruti Golechha, Mrs. Aarthi Rajan, Smt. Laxmi Arvind, Arvind Kumar, Pradeep Kumar Mathur, Khushant Wadhwa, M.K. Tiwari, Chiranjeev Johri, Rambabu, N. Eswara Rao, Ms. Prity Kumari, M/s. M. Rambabu & Co, Mahfooz A. Nazki, Dr. Lalit Bhasin, Ms. Nina Gupta, Ms. Ananya Marwah, Ms. Ruchika Joshi, Mudit Sharma, K. Ramamoorthy, M.A. Chinnasamy, C. Rubavathi, M. Veeraragavan, P. Rajaram, Kulwant Singh Narwal, V. Senthil Kumar, Ch. Leela Sarveswar, Venkatasamy, Dheeraj Nair, Ms. Avni Sharma, Manoj C. Mishra, M. Shoeb Alam, Guntur Prabhakar, Kunal Verma, Ms. Yugandhara Pawar Jha, Ashwin Kumar Nair, Satya Mitra, G. N. Reddy, T. V. Ratnam, P. Vinay Kumar, Kunal Verma, Sunil Fernandes, Vikas Mehta, Varinder Kumar Sharma, Guntur Prabhakar, Umesh Kumar Khaitan, Mrs. Laxmi Arvind, S.. Udaya Kumar Sagar, M/S. M. Rambabu And Co., Ejaz Maqbool, Manoj C. Mishra, M. Shoeb Alam, Kunal Verma, Mrs. Aarthi Rajan, Sunil Fernandes, Satya Mitra, G. N. Reddy, T. V. Ratnam, Lakshmi Raman Singh, Mrs. Laxmi Arvind, Guntur Prabhakar, P. Vinay Kumar, Sumanth Nookala, Dheeraj Nair, M/S. Venkat Palwai Law Associates, S.. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Mudit Sharma, Anirudh Sanganeria, Advocates

Table of Content
1. appeals against high court order (Para 1)
2. historical context of hyderabad's administration (Para 4 , 5)
3. legislative background and rights regarding jagirs (Para 11 , 24)

JUDGMENT :

HEMANT GUPTA, J.

CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 10770 OF 2016, 10738 OF 2016, 10768 OF 2016, 10769 OF 2016, 10773 OF 2016, 10775 OF 2016 AND 10776-10777 OF 2016

1. The present appeals are directed against an order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Andhra Pradesh on 3.4.2012¹[2012 SCC On Line AP 704] whereby the writ petitions challenging the Errata Notification dated 13.3.2006, published in the Official Gazette of the State of Andhra Pradesh on 6.4.2006 on behalf of Andhra Pradesh Wakf Board²[For Short “Wakf Board”], were dismissed. The said notification reads thus:

“THE ANDHRA PRADESH GAZETTE PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY HYDERABAD, THURSDAY, APRIL 6, 2006

Part-I Notifications by Government Heads of

Departments

And other Officers

CONTENTS

xxxx xx

ERRATA NOTIFICATION OF DARGAH NZT HUSSAIN SHAH VALI, MANIKONDA (V), RAJENDARANAGAR (M), R.R. DISTRICT

F. No. M1/69/PROT/RR/04 – In the Notification publi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(SC) 132

HEMANT GUPTA, V.RAMASUBRAMANIANState Of Andhra Pradesh (Now State Of Telangana) – AppellantVersusA. P. State Wakf Board – Respondent

HEMANT GUPTA, V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN
State Of Andhra Pradesh (Now State Of Telangana) – Appellant
Versus
A. P. State Wakf Board – Respondent