D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, SURYA KANT
Anju Kalsi – Appellant
Versus
HDFC Ergo General Insurance Respondents Company Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. These appeals arise from a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission [“NCDRC”]dated 24 March 2017 in the exercise of its revisional jurisdiction against an order of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission [“SCDRC”], Chandigarh.
3. On 3 September 2013, the appellant’s son obtained the benefit of an insurance cover under a policy called the “Cardsure Package Policy”. The appellant’s son was an account holder with HDFC Bank Limited and had availed of a debit card from the bank. The bank, which is the second respondent, obtained an insurance cover on 3 September 2013 from the first respondent. The insurance cover was to commence from 25 August 2013 and was to end on 24 August 2014. Against the payment of premium by the bank to the insurer, the insurer provided an insurance cover for card holders of the bank. For ‘Platinum’ card holders, the base cover was in the amount of Rs 5 lakhs. In addition, the cover would stand increased by five times of every rupee spent on purchases through the debit card, extending up to an accelerated cover of Rs 5 lakhs, thus making up a total sum insured of Rs 10 lakhs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.