HEMANT GUPTA, V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
State of Haryana Through Secretary To Government of Haryana – Appellant
Versus
Jai Singh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. amendments to the punjab village common lands act. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 6) |
| 2. previous court decisions on the act. (Para 3 , 5) |
| 3. legal implications of land ownership and management. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 40) |
| 4. definitions and ownership of common lands. (Para 43 , 49 , 60 , 66) |
| 5. final observations on land re-distribution and ownership. (Para 64 , 65 , 67 , 70 , 71) |
JUDGMENT :
HEMANT GUPTA, J.
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6990 OF 2014; CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 6610- 6612 OF 2016; CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6992 OF 2014; CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6991 OF 2014; CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6997 OF 2014; CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7001 OF 2014; CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4435 OF 2015; CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1675 OF 2022 AND CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1677 OF 2022
1. The subject matter of challenge in the present appeals is the amendments in the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 19611[For short, the ‘1961 Act’], as inserted by Haryana Act No. 9/19922[Amending Act], published on 11.2.1992 after the assent of the President of India.
2. The amendments carried out by the Amending Act came up for consideration before the Full Bench of Punjab and Ha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.