SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 456

AJAY RASTOGI, VIKRAM NATH
Radheshyam Bhagwandas Shah @ Lala Vakil – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s):Rishi Malhotra, Advocate
For the Respondent(s):Ankit Goel, Satyam Pandey, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

AJAY RASTOGI, J.

1. The present petition has been filed by the convict petitioner seeking direction in the nature of Mandamus to the State of Gujarat to consider his application for premature release under the policy dated 9th July, 1992 which was existing at the time of his conviction.

2. The petitioner along with other co-accused persons faced trial for the offence under Section 302, 376(2)(e)(g) read with Section 149 IPC committed in the State of Gujarat in 2004.

3. Indisputedly, the crime was committed in the State of Gujarat but this Court in Transfer Petition (Crl.) No. 192 of 2004, in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, considered it appropriate to transfer Sessions Case No. 161 of 2004 pending before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Dahod/Ahmedabad to the competent Court in Mumbai for trial and disposal by an Order dated 6th August 2004.

4. The learned trial Court, Mumbai in Sessions Case No. 634 of 2004, after holding trial, held the petitioner guilty and convicted him for the aforestated offences and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life by judgment dated 21st January 2008.

5. It may be relevant to note that one of the co-accused


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top