SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 827

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
UDAY UMESH LALIT, S. RAVINDRA BHAT, JJ.
Joginder Singh And Anr.- Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab And Ors. - Respondents
Review Petition(Civil) No. 267 of 2022 In Special Leave Petition (Civil) no.23306 of 2019
Decided on : 03-03-2022

The court found that the review petition did not establish any error apparent on record, leading to its dismissal.

Headnote:

Review Petition - Rejection - The court rejected the application for listing the Review Petition in open Court.

Fact of the Case:

The order passed by the Collector was affirmed by the Financial Commissioner in revision and by the Single Judge in a writ petition. The Letters Patent Appeal was rejected by the High Court, and a special leave petition was preferred in this Court. The High Court's view was affirmed after hearing learned counsel for the parties, and the special leave petition was dismissed. The grounds taken in the review petition did not make out any error apparent on record, leading to the dismissal of the review petition.

Finding of the Court:

The court affirmed the view taken by the High Court and dismissed the special leave petition and the review petition.

Issues: The issues involved the rejection of the special leave petition and the review petition, and the affirmation of the view taken by the High Court.

Ratio Decidendi: The grounds taken in the review petition did not establish any error apparent on record, leading to the dismissal of the review petition.

Final Decision: The special leave petition and the review petition were both dismissed by the court.

ORDER :

1. Application for listing Review Petition in open Court is rejected.

2. The order passed by the Collector was affirmed by the Financial Commissioner in revision and by the Single Judge in a writ petition arising therefrom. The Letters Patent Appeal having been rejected by the High Court, the special leave petition was preferred in this Court.

3. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, the view taken by the High Court was affirmed and the special leave petition was dismissed. We have gone through the grounds taken in the review petition, which do not make out any error apparent on record. This review petition is, therefore, dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top