SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(SC) 1871

ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
CIT, New Delhi – Appellant
Versus
Spice Enfotainment Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. K. Radhakrishnan, Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Mrs. Rekha Pandey, Mrs. Anil Katiyar.
For the Respondents: Mr. Ajay Vohra, Ms. Kavita Jha, Mr. Bhuwan Dhoopar.

ORDER :

1. Delay condoned.

2. Heard the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the parties.

3. We do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned judgments passed by the High Court.

4. In view of this, we find no merit in the appeals and special leave petitions.

5. Accordingly, the appeals and special leave petitions are dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top