1. Appeals and special leave petitions challenging judgments passed by the High Court. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 )
Back
Next 
2017 Supreme(SC) 1871
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, JJ.
CIT, New Delhi – Appellant
Versus
M/s Spice Enfotainment Ltd. – Respondent
Civil Appeal Nos. 285, 286 of 2014, 3125, 3625, 4317, 4318, 4319, 6052, 6580, 6581, 8030, 13763 of 2015, 662, 663, 672, 1602, 1603, 2608, 4447, 4449, 6058, 6984, 6985, 12045 of 2016, 3277, 3284, 3285 of 2017, S.L.P. (C) Nos. 8941, 8944, 28331, 29956 of 2015, S.L.P. (C) CC Nos. 10887, 12150-12151 of 2015
Decided On : 02-11-2017
Important Points
The court found no reason to interfere with the impugned judgments passed by the High Court.
Subject
Civil Law - Appeals and Special Leave Petitions
Headnote
Interference - Impugned Judgments - The court found no reason to interfere with the impugned judgments passed by the High Court.
Fact of the Case:
The court condoned the delay and heard the arguments of the Senior Counsel for the parties. The court found no reason to interfere with the impugned judgments passed by the High Court.
Finding of the Court:
The court found no merit in the appeals and special leave petitions and dismissed them accordingly.
Issues:
Ratio Decidendi: The court did not find any reason to interfere with the impugned judgments passed by the High Court.
Final Decision: The appeals and special leave petitions are dismissed.
Legal Category Hierarchy
Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. K. Radhakrishnan, Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Mrs. Rekha Pandey, Mrs. Anil Katiyar.
For the Respondents: Mr. Ajay Vohra, Ms. Kavita Jha, Mr. Bhuwan Dhoopar.
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. K. Radhakrishnan, Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Mrs. Rekha Pandey, Mrs. Anil Katiyar.
For the Respondents: Mr. Ajay Vohra, Ms. Kavita Jha, Mr. Bhuwan Dhoopar.
Table of Contents
ORDER :
1. Delay condoned.
2. Heard the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the parties.
3. We do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned judgments passed by the High Court.
4. In view of this, we find no merit in the appeals and special leave petitions.
5. Accordingly, the appeals and special leave petitions are dismissed.
