Raghubir Singh vs State of Haryana - 2021 Supreme(SC) 1129

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(SC) 1129

A.M.KHANWILKAR, SANJIV KHANNA
Raghubir Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Rao Ranjit, Mr. Narender Hooda, Mr. Vikas Goyat, Ms. Seema, Mr. Amit Sahni, Dr. Surender Singh Hooda, Mr. Siddhartha Dave, Mr. Ankur Mittal, Mr. Nidhi Mittal, Mr. Ankur Saboo, Mr. Mahabir Singh, Mr. S.P.S. Chauhan, Ms. Preeti Singh, Mr. Sunklan Porwal, Ms. Saumya Dwivedi, Mr. Karan Kapur, Mr. Manik Kapoor, Mr. Akshay Munjal, Mr. Subham Bhalla, Ms. Usha Nandini V.
For the Respondents: Mr. B.K. Satija, Mr. Himanshu Satija, Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, Dr. Monika Gusain, Ms. Adira A. Nair, Mr. Veena Bansal, Mr. Sorav Jindal, Mr. Abhishek Garg, Mr. Akshay Goyal, Mr. Alok Sangwan, Mr. Sumit Kumar Sharma, Mr. Anurag Kulharia.

ORDER :

Civil Appeals @ SLP (C) Nos. 6411-6412 of 2021

1. Leave granted.

2. These appeals take exception to the judgment and order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh dated 01.10.2020 in C.M. No. 9051 of 2020 in Writ Petition (C) No. 22241 of 2016 and C.M. No. 9059 of 2020 in Writ Petition (C) No. 22247 of 2016.

3. The question considered by the High Court is: whether the writ petitioners can be allowed to withdraw the writ petitions filed by them primarily seeking declaration of lapsing of acquisition of their lands and as an alternative relief to allow them to approach the respondent-State of Haryana urging to invoke its power to denotify the acquisition of lands in question under Section 101A of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (for short “2013 Act”) as applicable to the State of Haryana?

4. It is not in dispute that such liberty was granted in other cases by the coordinate Bench of the same High Court. In the present cases, however, the High Court relying on the dictum of the Constitution Bench of this Court in the Indore Development Authority vs. Manoharlal a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2021 Supreme(SC) 1129

A.M.KHANWILKAR, SANJIV KHANNARaghubir Singh – AppellantVersusState of Haryana – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

A.M.KHANWILKAR, SANJIV KHANNA
Raghubir Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent