D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, A. S. BOPANNA
Gajanand Burange – Appellant
Versus
Laxmi Chand Goyal – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Leave granted.
2. The appeal arises from a judgment dated 28 November 2018 of a Single Judge of the High Court of Chhattisgarh reversing the acquittal of the appellant for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act 18811[“NI Act”].
3. The facts lie on a narrow compass. On 7 November 2005, a notice was addressed by the respondent to the appellant alleging that the appellant had taken a cash loan of Rs 2.5 lakhs and had furnished a cheque dated 28 October 2005 towards repayment. The notice alleged that the cheque was returned by the bank to the respondent due to insufficiency of funds in the account of the appellant. The notice dated 7 November 2005 was received by the appellant on 8 November 2005. The respondent instituted a complaint against the appellant under Section 138 of the NI Act on 22 November 2005. On 1 February 2011, the trial court acquitted the appellant. The order of acquittal was questioned before the High Court in appeal. By a judgment dated 28 November 2018, the High Court has allowed the appeal and convicted the appellant for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the NI Act awarding a sentence of a fine in the amount of R
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.