NTR University of Health Sciences vs Yerra Trinadh

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(SC) 1119

M. R. SHAH, M. M. SUNDRESH
NTR University of Health Sciences – Appellant
Versus
Yerra Trinadh – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Y. Raja Gopala Rao, AOR Ms. Vismai Rao, Adv. Mr. Korada Pramod Kumar, Adv. Mr. Dhuli Gopi Krishna, Adv. M. Y. Ramesh,. Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Sr. Adv. Mr. Annam Venkatesh, AOR Mr. Rahul Mishra, Adv. Mr. D. Shiva Shankar, Adv. Ms. Agrimaa Singh, Adv. Ms. Ritumbhara Garg, Adv. Mr. Goli Rama Krishna, Adv. Mr. Sumanth Nookala, AOR Ch. Leela Sarveswar, Adv. Mr. K. S. Gnana Sambhedan, Adv. Mr. C. Raghavendran, Adv. Mr. Saurabh Gupta, Adv. Mr. M. A. Chinnasamy, AOR Mr. Ramesh Allanki, Adv. Ms. Aruna Gupta, AOR Mr. Syed Ahmad Naqvi, Adv. Mr. Srinivas Rao P., Adv. Mr. Mahfooz Ahsan Nazki, AOR Mr. Polanki Gowtham, Adv Ms. Rajeswari Mukherjee, Adv Mr. Shaik Mohamad Haneef, Adv Mr T. Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy, Adv Mr. K.V.Girish Chowdary, Adv Ms. Niti Richhariya, Adv

JUDGMENT :

M.R. Shah, J.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned common judgment and order dated 31.10.2019 passed by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amravati in Writ Appeal Nos. 363 & 364 of 2019, by which the Division Bench of the High Court has dismissed the said writ appeals and has confirmed the common judgment and order dated 19.09.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition Nos. 10376/2019 and 9486/2019 ordering/directing the re-evaluation of the answer scripts of the respective original writ petitioners who appeared in post-graduation in diploma course in the NTR University of Health Sciences (appellant herein), the University has preferred the present appeals.

2. That the original writ petitioners appeared in post-graduation diploma course conducted by the appellant – University. There was a digital evaluation of the answer scripts. In the first round of litigation, certain directions were issued by the learned Single Judge how to evaluate the answer scripts. The respective students – original writ petitioners were not satisfied with the evaluation of the answer scripts and therefore they filed writ petitions before the learned Single Judge pr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(SC) 1119

M. R. SHAH, M. M. SUNDRESHNTR University of Health Sciences – AppellantVersusYerra Trinadh – Respondent

Cases Referred (4)

M. R. SHAH, M. M. SUNDRESH
NTR University of Health Sciences – Appellant
Versus
Yerra Trinadh – Respondent