B. R. GAVAI, B. V. NAGARATHNA
BAHARUL ISLAM – Appellant
Versus
INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
NAGARATHNA, J.
| INDEX | ||
| Sl. No. | Particulars | |
| 1. | Brief facts of the case | |
| 2. | Bird’s Eye View of the controversy | |
| 3. | Submissions on behalf of the appellants | |
| 4. | Arguments on behalf of R-1 | |
| 5. | Arguments on behalf of R-7 | |
| 6. | Submissions on behalf of the State of Assam | |
| 7. | Points for consideration | |
| 8. | Constitutional Scheme | |
| 9. | Contentions on behalf of the UOI | |
| 10. | Interplay between Entry 66 of List 1 and Entry 25 of List III | |
| 11. | Relevant provisions of Indian MEDICAL COUNCIL ACT , 1956 | |
| 12. | Relevant provisions of Assam Rural Health Regulatory Authority Act , 2004 | |
| 13. | A comparative table and analysis of the provisions of the IMC Act, 1956 and the Assam Act | |
| 14. | Triology of cases | |
| 15. | Conclusions: |
Leave granted.
2. In these appeals, the appellants have assailed the legality and correctness of the order dated 30.10.2014 p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.