Aldanish Rein vs Union of India - 2022 Supreme(SC) 1670

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(SC) 1670

M. R. SHAH, KRISHNA MURARI
Aldanish Rein – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Ramesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate, Petitioner-in-person, For the Appellant / Mr. Aldanish Rein, Advocate, Mr. Sandeep Pandey, Advocate, For the Respondent.

ORDER

1. Permission to appear and argue in person is granted.

2. Having heard the petitioner-in-person and having gone through the Emblem of which the grievance is made, it cannot be said that the Emblem is in any way contrary to the provisions of the State Emblem of India (Prohibition of Improper Use) Act, 2005 (for short 'the State Emblem Act, 2005'). It cannot be said that the Emblem installed on top of the Central Vista Project at New Delhi can be said to be contrary to any of the provisions of the State Emblem Act, 2005. The State Emblem of India installed on top of the Central Vista Project cannot be said to be in violation of the State Emblem Act, 2005.

3. The Writ Petition stands dismissed.

4. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document