VINEET SARAN, ANIRUDDHA BOSE
Sabir – Appellant
Versus
Bhoora @ Nadeem – Respondent
ORDER
1. Leave granted.
2. These appeals arise out of the same FIR dated 18.08.2020 lodged under Section 302 of the IPC for the murder of the brother of the complainant. The complainant has filed these appeals. The respondents were arrested after nearly six months of the incident. The Trial Court rejected their bail application. However, the High Court has granted the bail to the respondents in the appeals by the impugned orders, which are under challenge in these appeals.
3. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned counsel for the accused/respondents. We have also heard Mr. Ajay Kumar Misra, learned AAG for the State, who has supported the case of the appellant and perused the material placed on record.
4. On perusal of the impugned orders, what is noteworthy is that in the impugned orders passed by the High Court no reason has been given for grant of bail. In the case of murder (under Section 302 IPC), it is expected that at least some reason would be given while reversing the order of the Trial Court, which had rejected the bail application by a reasoned order. What we notice is that in the impugned orders the High Court, while granting bail, has only state
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.