Qurban Ali vs Union of India - 2022 Supreme(SC) 1428

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(SC) 1428

A. M. KHANWILKAR, ABHAY S. OKA, C. T. RAVIKUMAR
Qurban Ali – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Advocate, ms. Anjana Prakash, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Nizam Pasha, Advocate, Ms. Rashmi Singh, Advocate, Ms. Sumita Hazarika, Advocate, For the Appellant / Mr. Tushar Mehta Ld SG, Mr. K. M. Nataraj, Ld ASG, Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, Advocate, Mr. Varun Chugh, Advocate, Mr. O. P. Shukla, Advocate, Mr. Rajat Nair, Advocate, Mr. M. Malhotra, Advocate, Mr. Kanu Agrawal, Advocate, Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Varun Chugh, Advocate, Mr. G.S. Makker, Advocate, Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, Advocate, Mr. Tushar Mehta, Ld SG, Mr. K.M. Natraj, Ld ASG, Mr. Sanjay Kr. Tyagi, Advocate, Mr. O.P. Shukla, Advocate, Mr. Varun Chugh, Advocate, Mr. Jatinder Kumar Sethi, Dy. A.G., Mr. Abhishek Atrey, Advocate, Mr. Akash Giri, Advocate, Mr. Shadman Ali, Advocate, Ms. Ambika Atrey, Advocate, Mr. Ashutosh Kumar Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Vishnu Shankar Jain, Advocate, Mr. Kaleeswaram Raj, Advocate, Mr. Mohammed Sadique T.A., Advocate, Mrs. Anu K. Joy, Advocate, Mr. Alim Anvar, Advocate, Mr. Varun C. Vijay, Advocate, Ms. Thulasi K. Raj, Advocate, Mr. Shadan Farasat, Advocate, Mr. Aman Naqvi, Advocate, Ms. Tanvi Tuhina, Advocate, Mr. Chitranshul A. Sinha, Advocate, Mr. Aaditya Vijaykumar, Advocate, Ms. Shreya Shree Singh, Advocate, Mr. Ashutosh Dubey, Advocate, Mr. Devendra Singh, Advocate, Mr. Abhishek, Advocate, For the Respondent.

ORDER

I.A. NO. 61197 OF 2022

1. This application pertains to the event which has already taken place from 17.04.2022 to 19.04.2022 in the State of Himachal Pradesh.

2. Learned counsel for the State of Himachal Pradesh, on instructions, submits that necessary preventive measures were taken and after the event, corrective steps as required in terms of the decisions of this Court in Shakti Vahini Vs. Union of India & Ors., (2018) 7 SCC 192 (paragraph 55) Tehseen S. Poonawalla Vs. Union of India & Ors., (2018) 9 SCC 501 (paragraphs 40 and 41) and Kodungallur Film Society and Anr. Vs. Union of India & Ors., (2018) 10 SCC 713 (Paragraphs 20 and 21) have also been taken by the concerned authorities. He prays for some time to place the same on record by way of affidavit.

3. We direct that the affidavit of Secretary, Home Department, State of Himachal Pradesh be filed in that regard on or before 07.05.2022.

4. During the course of hearing of this application, Mr. Kapil Sibal, learned senior counsel, pointed out that he has instructions to state that an event has been planned at Roorkee, Uttarakhand of the same kind for tomorrow i.e., 27.04.2022. An application is being filed in the Registry in t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(SC) 1428

A. M. KHANWILKAR, ABHAY S. OKA, C. T. RAVIKUMARQurban Ali – AppellantVersusUnion of India – Respondent

Cases Referred (3)

A. M. KHANWILKAR, ABHAY S. OKA, C. T. RAVIKUMAR
Qurban Ali – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent