Sanjay vs Union of India - 2023 Supreme(SC) 636

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(SC) 636

A. S. BOPANNA, M. M. SUNDRESH
Sanjay – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Namit Saxena, AOR, Ms. Ritu Sharma, Adv., Mr. Shivam Raghuwanshi, Adv., Mr. Awnish Maithani, Adv., Ms. Shiksha Ashra, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Nachiketa Joshi, Adv., Mr. Shubhendu Anand, Adv., Mr. Saransh Kumar, Adv., Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR

ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as also learned counsel for the respondent and perused the petition papers.

2. Though in terms of our earlier order dated 16.05.2023, learned counsel for the respondent-State has brought to our notice that medical treatment was offered to the petitioner, keeping in view the nature of illness we deem it appropriate that the petitioner avail his remedy for appropriate treatment as per his requirement. Therefore, we deem it proper to release him on interim bail for a period of six weeks, subject to appropriate conditions being imposed by the trial court for which purpose the petitioner shall be produced before the trial court forthwith. During the period of six weeks, the petitioner may secure treatment in that regard.

3. Since the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that regular bail application of the petitioner is pending before the High Court, in the meantime, he may also seek consideration of the same before the High Court.

4. The special leave petition is disposed of.

Pending application(s) shall also stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document