SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(SC) 745

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
DHANANJAYA Y. CHANDRACHUD, CJI., PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, J.B. PARDIWALA, JJ.
Ajay Shankar Srivastava - Petitioner
Versus
Bar Council of India & Anr. - Respondents
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 82 of 2023
Decided On : 10-04-2023

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Anand Nandan, Adv., Mr. Amit Pawan, AOR, Mr. Dhruv Shankar Misra, Adv., Mr. Mohd Faiz, Adv., Mr. Zubair, Adv., Mr. Aakarsh, Adv., Ms. Shubhangi, Adv., Mr. Akshat Srivastava, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. Manan Kumar Mishra, Sr. Adv., Mr. Apurba Kumar Sharma, Sr. Adv., Ms. Radhika Gautam, AOR, Ms. Anjul Divedi, Adv.

The due verification of advocates is essential to preserve the integrity of the administration of justice.

Headnote:

Verification of Advocates - Bar Council of India - Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules 2015 - The judgment discusses the process of verification of advocates' certificates and place of practice, the challenges faced, the importance of verification to preserve the integrity of the administration of justice, and the constitution of a High Powered Committee to monitor the verification process.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a practicing advocate, challenged an office order of the Bar Council of India related to the verification of advocates' degrees and enrollments, and the method of co-opting members of the State Bar Councils to fill up casual vacancies.

Finding of the Court:

The Court emphasized the importance of verifying advocates' qualifications to preserve the integrity of the administration of justice and constituted a High Powered Committee to monitor the verification process.

Issues: Challenging an office order of the Bar Council of India related to the verification of advocates' degrees and enrollments, and the method of co-opting members of the State Bar Councils to fill up casual vacancies.

Ratio Decidendi: The due verification of advocates is crucial to preserve the integrity of the administration of justice, and a High Powered Committee was constituted to monitor the verification process.

Final Decision: The Court directed the constitution of a High Powered Committee to monitor the process of verification and issued guidelines for the verification of advocates' educational degree certificates and certificates of enrollment.

Judgement Key Points
  • The petitioner, a practicing advocate, challenged a Bar Council of India office order dated 1 November 2022 directing State Bar Councils to halt verification processes and the method for co-opting members to fill casual vacancies in State Bar Councils. (!)
  • In 2015, the Bar Council of India notified rules for verification of advocates' certificates and place of practice, leading to commencement of the process by State Bar Councils and the Bar Council of India. (!)
  • Challenges to the 2015 verification rules in various High Courts were transferred to the Supreme Court. (!)
  • A prior High Powered Committee was formed by the Bar Council of India to monitor verification, but issues arose due to universities demanding fees, addressed by a Supreme Court direction on 1 March 2017 prohibiting such charges. (!) (!)
  • Out of approximately 20.57 lakh enrolled advocates, only about 9.22 lakh verification forms or declarations were received, with many State Bar Councils showing low submission rates. (!) (!) (!)
  • Unsubmitted forms raise concerns about unqualified individuals or those with fake degrees entering court practice, potentially disrupting judicial work, necessitating their identification and removal. (!)
  • Verification of enrolled advocates' educational degrees and enrollment certificates is essential to maintain the integrity of the administration of justice, as fake qualifications pose a grave threat. (!)
  • The 1 November 2022 office order criticized hasty issuance of practice certificates by the Uttar Pradesh Bar Council without proper degree verification but allowed ongoing proper verifications to continue; it was not intended to stop verification entirely. (!) (!)
  • The Supreme Court directed constitution of a new High Powered Committee, chaired by a former Supreme Court Judge, with specified members including former High Court Judges, senior advocates, and Bar Council of India nominees, to monitor verification. (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!)
  • The Committee is empowered to issue guidelines and directions for verifying both educational degrees and enrollment certificates, with State Bar Councils required to comply and report. (!)
  • Universities and examination boards must verify certificates without fees and without delay. (!)
  • The Committee shall convene promptly, submit a status report by 31 August 2023, and the matter listed on 11 September 2023. (!) (!)
  • The order does not extend existing terms of Bar Councils. (!)

JUDGMENT :

Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, CJI.

1. The petitioner, who is a practising advocate, has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court to seek two distinct reliefs. The first of them is for challenging an office order dated 1 November 2022 of the Bar Council of India to all the State Bar Councils, the purport of which (according to the petitioner) was to interdict the process of verification of advocates who are enrolled with the State Bar Councils for scrutinizing the genuineness of their degrees and enrollments. The second issue deals with the method of co-opting members of the State Bar Councils to fill up casual vacancies.

2. We have heard Mr. Anand Nandan, counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Manan Kumar Mishra, senior counsel, appearing on behalf of the Bar Council of India with Mr. Apurba Kumar Sharma.

3. In 2015, the Bar Council of India notified the Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules 2015,1[“2015 Rules”]. The process of verification of the certificates and place of practice commenced with efforts by the State Bar Councils and the Bar Council of India.

4. The 2015 Rules were challenged before several High Courts, including the High Court of Delhi. A Transfer Petition was instituted before this Court by the Bar Council of India. The proceedings pending before diverse High Courts were transferred to this Court in Transferred Case (Civil) No 126 of 2015.

5. The Bar Council of India constituted a High Powered Committee for monitoring the process of verification which was headed by a former Judge of the Supreme Court, two former Judges of the High Courts and three members of the Bar Council of India.

6. The process of verification encountered difficulties as a result of the charges which were demanded by the Universities for verification of the educational certificates of the advocates. On 1 March 2017, a two-Judge Bench of this Court issued a direction to all the Universities not to demand charges for verification of educational certificates.

7. The process of verification has consumed time as the number of advocates which stood at 16 lakh, at the material time, is estimated to be almost 25.70 lakh, at the present. The counter affidavit which has been filed by the Bar Council of India indicates the State-wise position in regard to verification of enrolled advocates. The tabulated statement is produced below :

IMAGE

8. The above statement indicates that out of 20.57 lakh advocates, about 7.55 lakh forms were received for the purpose of verification. Senior advocates and advocates-on-record were only required to issue a declaration and, accordingly, 1.99 lakh declarations have been received. The total number of forms received is, thus, 9.22 lakhs, as indicated in the above table.

9. The above table indicates that a majority of advocates enrolled with the State Bar Councils have not submitted their verification forms. The Bar Council of India apprehends that many advocates who have not submitted their forms for verification are persons who are not qualified or are “in possession of fake degrees”. The Bar Council of India has submitted and, with justification, that this class of persons, without the possession of qualifications required for law practice, is known to enter upon the arena of courts for extraneous purposes, including the disruption of work. The Bar Council of India is justified in asserting that such persons have to be identified and weeded out from the list of advocates enrolled with the Bar Councils.

10. The due verification of advocates who are enrolled with the State Bar Councils, is of utmost importance to preserve the integrity of the administration of justice. Persons who profess to be lawyers, but do not either have the educational qualifications or degree certificates on the basis of which they could have lawfully granted entry to the Bar, pose a grave danger to the administration of justice to citizens. Hence, it is the duty of every genuine advocate of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top