Appellate Courts Can Rely on Unexhibited Public Documents Produced by Plaintiff: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Right to Promotion is Legitimate Expectation; Marriage-Based Transfer Can't Defeat It: Himachal Pradesh High Court
12 Mar 2026
Past Licenses and Undertaking Prove Knowledge of Copyright License Need, Warrant Ad-Interim Injunction: Bombay HC
13 Mar 2026
Non-Compliance on Counter Affidavits Draws Exemplary Costs Warning: Supreme Court in Gauri Maulekhi PIL
13 Mar 2026
SLPs Challenging PoP Idol Immersion Orders Disposed as Infructuous; Liberty to Assist Bombay HC: Supreme Court
13 Mar 2026
D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J B PARDIWALA
Sanket Kumar Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Apg Logistics Private Limited – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JUDGMENT
Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI.
Admit.
2. This appeal arises under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016["IBC"] from a judgment dated 9 January 2023 of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal.["NCLAT" ] The NCLAT dismissed the appeal against the order of the National Company Law Tribunal["NCLT"] on the ground of limitation.
3. The appellant instituted an application under Section 7 of the IBC in June 2021 seeking the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against the respondent. The application was dismissed by the NCLT by an order dated 26 August 2022. On 2 September 2022, the appellant filed an application for obtaining a certified copy of the order which was pronounced by the NCLT. The application was received by the Registry of NCLT on 5 September 2022. On 15 September 2022, the order was uploaded on the website of the NCLT and a certified copy was provided to the appellan
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of clarity and consistency in administrative guidance, particularly regarding the computation of limitation for filing an appeal. Th....
Appeal – Limitation stops running on e-filing of appeal before NCLAT and not on presentation of physical copy – Date on which limitation begins to run is intrinsically linked to date of pronouncement....
(1) Appeal – Period of limitation – Any party which is aggrieved by decision of NCLT can file appeal before NCLAT – Statutory time limit of 30 days within which appeal can be preferred, is extendable....
The NCLAT cannot condone delays beyond the statutory maximum of 45 days under the IBC, emphasizing strict adherence to limitation periods in insolvency processes.
The limitation for filing an appeal begins upon the pronouncement of the order and not its publication, making delays uncondonable if not filed timely.
Appeal – Limitation – Though National Company Law Appellate Tribunal is clothed with powers to exempt and to extend time under Rules 14 and 15 of NCLAT Rules respectively, such powers cannot be exerc....
The court recognized the importance of e-filing in legal procedures while addressing challenges related to limitation periods in appeals before the NCLAT.
The court established that free certified copies and those obtained for a fee are treated equally for appeal purposes under the IBC and relevant rules.
Delay in filing an appeal under the IBC cannot be excused based on lack of knowledge regarding the proceedings; Limitation must be strictly construed.
The IBC mandates strict adherence to limitation periods for appeals, emphasizing timely resolution in insolvency proceedings.
V Nagarajan v. SKS Ispat and Power Limited & Ors
-
Read summary
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.