Hyderabad Cricket Association vs Charminar Cricket Club

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(SC) 886

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, MANOJ MISRA, ARAVIND KUMAR
Hyderabad Cricket Association – Appellant
Versus
Charminar Cricket Club – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Sidharth Dave, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Vivek Pathak, Advocate, Mr. Prakhar Sharma, Advocate, Ms. Anu Gupta, Advocate, Mr. Gaurav Pachnanda, Sr. Advocate, Ms. Shreyasi Kunwar, Advocate, Ms. Nikita Jaitly, Advocate, Mr. Ravindra Vikram, Advocate, Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Shashi Bhushan Kumar, Advocate, Mr. B. Shravanth Shanker, Advocate, Ms. Monalisa Kosaria, Advocate, Mr. B Yeshwanth Raj, Advocate, Mr. Rahul Jajoo, Advocate, Ms. Prerna Robin, Advocate, Mr. Rijuk Sarkar, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Rakesh Kumar Khanna, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Ashutosh Dubey, Advocate, Mr. Abhishek Chauhan, Advocate, Mr. Ashutosh Dubey, Advocate, Ms. Rajshri Dubey, Advocate, Mrs. Rajshri Dubey, Advocate, Mr. Amit P Shahi, Advocate, Mr. H. B. Dubey, Advocate, Mr. Manish Dhingra, Advocate, Mr. Amit P. Shahi, Advocate, Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate, Mr. Manish Dheengra, Advocate, Mr. Gaurav Yadav, Advocate, Mr. Gaganmeetsingh Sachdeva, Advocate, Ms. Ramya Khanna, Advocate, Mr. Shashi Bhushan Kumar, Advocate, Mr. B. Shravanth Shanker, Advocate, Ms. Monalisa Kosaria, Advocate, Mr. B Yeshwanth Raj, Advocate, Mr. Rahul Jajoo, Advocate, Ms. Prerna Robin, Advocate, Mr. Rijuk Sarkar, Advocate, Shri. Gaichangpou Gangmei, Advocate, Mr. Arjun D. Singh, Advocate, Mr. Yashvir Kumar, Advocate, for the Respondent.

ORDER

1. Applications to bring on record additional facts/documents and permission to file additional documents are allowed.

2. We are of the view that the impasse must be broken and elections held which was the original objective. In fact the dispute over Ombudsman came to this Court and in the whole process this matter has continued while the very appointment of Ombudsman was for a period of one year! Now the question is how to ensure that a fair and proper elections are held so that the matter can be put to rest.

3. Some suggestions were made. This Court is of the view that Hon'ble L. Nageswara Rao, J. (Retd.) of this Court would be the most appropriate person to be appointed as the single Member Committee to sort out this mess. It is open to him to take assistance of whatever person/authority he so desires. He will fix his own emoluments. The expenses will be borne by the Association. If the learned Judge needs some directions from this Court, the matter be placed limited for the aforesaid purpose.Needless to say that the Association will render all necessary support for the learned Judge to carry out the exercise.

4. In view of what we have already noted, qua the issue of Supervis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(SC) 886

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, MANOJ MISRA, ARAVIND KUMARHyderabad Cricket Association – AppellantVersusCharminar Cricket Club – Respondent

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, MANOJ MISRA, ARAVIND KUMAR
Hyderabad Cricket Association – Appellant
Versus
Charminar Cricket Club – Respondent