JUDGMENT :

S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.

1. The appellants challenge a decision of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi¹ [Order dated 28.02.2023 by NCLAT in C.A. (AT) No. 991/2022] (hereinafter referred to as “NCLAT”) which ruled that as beneficiary of a decree by the Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority (hereinafter referred to as “UPRERA”) the order of the Resolution Professional (R.P.) proposing that they be treated differently from other home buyers allottees, does not call for interference.

2. The brief facts are that the appellants are home buyers, who had opted for allotment in a real estate project of the respondent company (hereinafter referred to as “Bulland Buildtech Pvt. Ltd.” or “the respondent.” Aggrieved by the delay in the completion of the project, the appellants approached the UPRERA which by its orders upheld this entitlement to refund amounts deposited by the, together with interest. In the meantime, proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as “IBC”) were initiated. In the course of proceedings after due consultations by the Committee of Creditors, a resolution plan was presented to the adjudicating auth