A. K. SIKRI, ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
Commissioner Of Central Excise & Customs – Appellant
Versus
Precot Meridian Ltd. – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Indubitably, the benefit of exemption Notification No. 5/99-CE dated 28.02.1999 is available subject to certain conditions and one of the conditions is that the assessee had not taken any credit under Rule 57A or Rule 57B or Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, in the process of dyeing, printing, bleaching or mercerising in the manufacture of dyed, printed, bleached or mercerised yarn.
2. As mentioned above, this Notification was issued on 28.02.1999. The product of the respondent is covered by the description of goods at Serial No. 133 of the Table annexed with the General Exemption Notification. The assessee, however, had utilized the MODVAT credit in the previous two years prior to 28.02.1999. As per the assessee, after the issuance of this notification, no such MODVAT credit was ever taken or utilized. Even the earlier MODVAT credit which was utilised was returned or paid back on 10.01.2005. In this scenario, question arose as to whether the assessee fulfils the aforesaid condition in order to become eligible to get the benefit of the Exemption Notification.
3. We note that five-Member Bench of the Tribunal in the case of 'Franco Italian Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. Commiss
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.