SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(SC) 432

SANJIV KHANNA, DIPANKAR DATTA
All India Bank Officers’ Confederation – Appellant
Versus
Regional Manager, Central Bank of India – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Rajesh Mahale, AOR Mr. R. Chandrachud, AOR Mr. Abhishek Atrey, AOR Mr. Sayid Marzook Bafaki, AOR
For the Respondent(s): M/S. Mitter & Mitter Co., AOR Mr. N. Venaktaraman, ASG Mr. Wasim Qadri, Sr. Adv. Mrs. Gargi Khanna, Adv. Mr. Shashank Bajpai, Adv. Mr. Prahlad Singh, Adv. Mr. H. R. Rao, Adv. Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, AOR Mr. V. Chitambaresh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Harshad V. Hameed, AOR Mr. Dileep Poolakkot, Adv. Mrs. Ashly Harshad, Adv. Mr. Shivam Sai, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Kumar Gautam, AOR Mr. Anant Gautam, Adv. Mr. Samir Mudgil, Adv. Ms. Anani Achumi, Adv. Mr. Dinesh Sharma, Adv. Ms. Shivani Sagar, Adv. Mr. Anuvrat Sharma, AOR Mr. Badri Prasad Singh, AOR Mr. Sanjay Kapur, AOR Mr. Surya Prakash, Adv. Mr. Devesh Dubey, Adv. Ms. Divya Singh Pundir, Adv. Mr. Arjun Bhatia, Adv. Ms. Shubhra Kapoor, Adv. Ms. Isha Virmai, Adv. Ms. Mahima Kapur, Adv. Mr. Surya Nath Pandey, AOR Ms. Bahavi S. Patnaik, Adv. Mr. Hitesh Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Amit Kumar Chawla, Adv. Mr. H. Pandian, Adv. Mr. Mahipal Singh, Adv. Mr. Subhashish Mohanty, Adv. Mr. Radha Shyam Jena, AOR M/S. J S Wad And Co, AOR

This common judgment decides the appeals filed by staff unions and officers’ associations of various banks, impugning judgments which dismiss their writ petitions, where the vires of Section 17(2)(viii) of the Income Tax Act, 19611[For short, “Act”.] or Rule 3(7)(i) of the Income Tax Rules, 19622[For short, “Rules”.], or both, were challenged.

2. Section 17(2)(viii) of the Act includes in the definition of ‘perquisites’3[Section 17(2) of the Act defines perquisites. It specifies a list of benefits/advantages, incidental to employment, and received in excess of salary, which are made taxable as perquisites. Section 17(2)(viii) is a residuary clause that authorizes a subordinate rule-making authority to prescribe ‘any other fringe benefits or amenities’ that are liable to taxation as ‘perquisites’.], ‘any other fringe benefit or amenity’, ‘as may be prescribed’.4[Before amendments brought in by Finance (No.2) Act, 2009, with effect from 01.04.2010, Section 17(2)(vi) of the Act read: “(vi) the value of any other fringe benefit or amenity (excluding the fringe benefits chargeable to tax under Chapter XIIH) as may be prescribed”. Post the amendment, Section 17(2)(viii), in effect contain

            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
            1
            2
            3
            4
            5
            6
            7
            8
            9
            10
            11
            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
            supreme today icon
            logo-black

            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

            Please visit our Training & Support
            Center or Contact Us for assistance

            qr

            Scan Me!

            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

            whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
            whatsapp-icon Back to top