Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Bhuwan Raj, AOR Mr. Raman Singh, Adv. Ms. Manju Savita, Adv. Mr. Niraj Dubey, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Ms. Preeti Goel,Adv. Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh, AOR Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Srikant Singh, Adv. Mr. Akash, Adv. Dr. Varnit Sharma, Adv. Mr. Suraj Pal Singh, Adv. Mr. Divyesh Pratap Singh, AOR Mr. Amit Sangwan, Adv. Mr. Ashu Bhindwar, Adv. Ms. Sneha Chandna, Adv. Mr. Varun Singh, Adv. Mr. Vikram Pratap Singh, Adv.

The legal document provided does not explicitly mention or discuss the concept of a psychological autopsy. However, it highlights the importance of a thorough and comprehensive investigation into the circumstances surrounding the death, especially in cases of suicide. The court emphasizes that the investigation should explore all angles, including underlying factors that may have contributed to the deceased’s mental state and decision to take their own life.

A psychological autopsy is a specialized investigative tool used to determine the mental state of the deceased prior to death, often involving psychological assessments, interviews with acquaintances, and review of medical and personal history. It can provide valuable insights into whether the death was truly a suicide, accidental, or due to other causes, and can help establish or refute elements like intent, mental health issues, or external influences.

In the context of the case, the court’s directive for a reinvestigation underscores the necessity for an independent, thorough inquiry that may include, if deemed appropriate, a psychological autopsy to uncover the deceased’s mental condition and the possible psychological factors leading to her death. Such an approach aligns with the court’s concern for uncovering the complete and true story behind the incident, beyond the superficial or initial findings, ensuring that all relevant factors, including psychological ones, are adequately explored during the reinvestigation.