Back
J. B. PARDIWALA, R. MAHADEVAN
Mansi Brar Fernandes – Appellant
Versus
Shubha Sharma – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. understanding the legislative intent and objectives of ibc. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. case background and parties' arguments regarding financial creditor status. (Para 6 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. court’s perspective on speculative investments vs genuine homebuyer. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 4. legal criteria for identifying speculative investors. (Para 16 , 19) |
| 5. importance of protecting genuine homebuyers and legislative recommendations. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 25 , 26) |
JUDGMENT :
R. Mahadevan, J.
1. There are four appeals, which, having been heard together, are being disposed of by this common judgment.
2. The first three appeals, viz., C.A. No. 3826 of 2020, C.A. No. 540 of 2021, and C.A. No. 5495 of 2025 arise out of the final judgment and order dated 17.11.20201[For short, “the first impugned order”] passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi2[For short, “the NCLAT”], in Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 83 of 2020. The fourth appeal, viz., C.A. No. 3903 of 2022, is directed against the final judgment and order dated 12.08.20213[For short, “the second impugned order”] passed by the NCLAT in Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.1020 of 2019.
3. C.A.
The court affirmed the distinction between speculative investors and genuine homebuyers under the IBC, emphasizing that the Insolvency framework is meant for genuine claims and not for speculative pr....
Industrial unit allottees with assured returns not financial creditors under S.5(8)(f) IBC; treated as other creditors, distinct from protected homebuyers.
The court affirmed that once debt and default are established under Section 7 of the IBC, admission into CIRP is mandatory, preventing misuse of the process as merely a recovery mechanism.
The Tribunal held that applicants who withdrew from a real estate project and obtained Recovery Certificates cannot pursue corporate insolvency under IBC, thus failing to meet the mandatory allottees....
The dismissal of the application under Section 65 demonstrates that mere allegations of malice and fraud in insolvency proceedings require substantiation with clear evidence; insufficient for halting....
Homebuyers are recognized as financial creditors under the Insolvency Code, critical for determining claims irrespective of the investor's speculative intentions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
