RAJESH BINDAL, VIJAY BISHNOI
Bhartiya Mazdoor Sangh, U. P. – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 165 , 166 , 170 , 171 , 172 , 173 , 174 , 175 , 196 , 198 , 199 , 200 , 201 , 202) |
JUDGMENT :
| INDEX | ||
| S. No. | Particulars | Para No. |
| 01 | BRIEF FACTS | 1 - 3.1 |
| 02 | ARGUMENTS | |
| Arguments on behalf of different Labour Unions | 4-32 | |
| Arguments on behalf of Noticee No. 3 | 33-35 | |
| Arguments on behalf of Noticee Nos.1,2,4,6 to 9 | 36-42 | |
| Arguments by applicants (i) I.A. No. 174033 of 2024 I.A. Nos. 19952/2026 and 19965/2026 | 43-53 | |
| Response of GDCL/JUL | 54-96 | |
| Rejoinder by Petitioners and Applicants | 97-103 | |
| 03 | DISCUSSIONS | |
| List of Dates and Events | 104-105 | |
| Rehabilitation Scheme submitted by GDCL (SS-92) | 106 | |
| Contributions made by GDCL | 107-110 | |
| Regarding JAIL | 111-116 | |
| Regarding Financial Status of GDCL | 117-121 | |
| Conduct of GDCL | 122-13 | |
| Sale of assets of JUL by GDCL | 139-145 | |
|
| ||
BRS Ventures Investments Ltd. vs. SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd.
Sivanandan C.T. and Others vs. High Court of Kerala and Others
The Court reaffirmed that managerial control does not equate to ownership, emphasizing that all asset sales by GDCL were illegal following the abatement of previous SICA proceedings, thus prioritizin....
The official liquidator must adjudicate and prioritize claims from workers and creditors according to statutory provisions, ensuring that dues to workers are paramount over other claims, aligning wit....
Unregistered agreements do not confer rights under the Transfer of Property Act; claims in insolvency must follow IBC regulations.
The court affirmed SEBI's authority to regulate collective investment schemes, prioritizing investor protection against mismanagement.
No question of the NCLT sitting over the judgment and orders passed by previous bodies like BIFR, AAIFR or even learned Single Judge as was sought to be made out. On the contrary, we feel that the de....
The court retains discretion to refuse sanctioning a reconstruction scheme despite majority approval, particularly when misfeasance by directors and financial impracticality are evident.
Gratuity and provident fund claims of employees are not part of the liquidation estate under the IBC, 2016 and must be prioritized for payment.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.