SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(SC) 722

PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, N. V. ANJARIA
Sarafat Ali (Deceased) Through Lrs – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Director Of Consolidation Haridwar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Adv. Mr. S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Nagendra Singh, Adv. Mr. Surjeet Singh, Adv. Mr. Yojit Mehra, Adv. Mr. Amartya Bhushan, Adv. Mr. Ram Shiromani Yadav, Adv. Mr. Naman Raj Singh, Adv. Mr. Parth Singh, Adv. Dr. Sushil Balwada, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Akshat Kumar, AOR Ms. Anubha Dhulia, Adv. Dr. Amardeep Gaur, Adv. Ms. Anjali Saxena, Adv. Ms. Neerja, Adv. Ms. Nidhi Jain, Adv. M/s V. Maheshwari & Co., AOR Mr. Naved Anwar, Adv. Mr. Kshitij Mudgal, AOR Mr. Vikalp Mudgal, Adv. Mr. Ansh Mittal, Adv. Mr. Amit Jay Singh, Adv. Mr. Parmanand Gaur, AOR

JUDGMENT :

PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, J.

1) Leave granted.

2) The lis at hand concerns a protracted dispute arising from the rights asserted by the appellants under a sale deed dated 04.06.1957. What initially commenced as proceedings for mutation gradually traversed into the realm of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 19501[Hereinafter referred to as Abolition Act] and the consolidation framework, though its odyssey across multiple forums only culminated in futility, with the authorities below concurrently holding that the appellants had failed to prove the execution of the said sale deed, thereby compelling them to seek refuge before this Court.

FACTUAL MATRIX

3) The chequered trail of the lis can be adumbrated as thus: the predecessors of the appellants herein purchased the land measuring 15 bigha, 11 biswa, 0 Biswansi of Khasra No.70/32 situated in Narsipur Kalan village, Jwalapur Paragana, Roorki Tehsil, Haridwar District, through a registered sale deed dated 04.06.1957. It is to be noted that the predecessors of the appellants were minors at the time of purchase. Subsequently, the possession of the said land was transferred, and the appellants claim to be in possession

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top