SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(SC) 755

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
DIPANKAR DATTA, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, JJ.
Mr. Nilesh Shah & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
Securities And Exchange Board Of India & Anr. – Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 6529 of 2026
With
Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited - Appellant
Versus
Securities And Exchange Board Of India - Respondent
Civil Appeal No.4681 Of 2026
With
Kotak Mahindra Trustee Company Limited - Appellant
Versus
Securities And Exchange Board Of India & Ors. – Respondents
Civil Appeal No.6527 Of 2026
Decided On : 13-07-2026

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Shyam Divan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Ankur Saigal, Adv. Mr. Ashwath Rau, Adv. Ms. S. Lakshmi Iyer, Adv. Ms. Deepsikha Mishra, Adv. Mr. Kashish Bhatia, Adv. Ms. Anushree Kapooria, Adv. Ms. Aditi Shukla, Adv. Mr. Ritish Desai, Adv. Ms. Dishti Kaji, Adv. Mr. Ankur Singhal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR Mr. Anshula L Bakhru, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Amarjit Singh Bedi, Adv. Ms. Surekha Raman, Adv. Mr. Shreyash Kumar, Adv. Mr. Sidharth Nair, Adv. Mr. Harshit Singh, Adv. Mr. Yashwant Sanjenbam, Adv. M/S. K. J. John And Co., AOR

JUDGMENT :

DIPANKAR DATTA, J.

“MUTUAL FUND INVESTMENTS ARE SUBJECT TO MARKET RISKS, READ ALL SCHEME-RELATED DOCUMENTS CAREFULLY.”

1. An average Indian is more than familiar with this unmistakable phrase. Brandished at most noticeable places, it cautions potential investors of the likely risks of investment in mutual funds. The present appeals deal with one such risky scenario ostensibly created by the appellants.

THE APPEAL

2. The appeals, under Section 15Z of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 19921[SEBI Act], are directed against a common judgment and order2[impugned order] of the Securities Appellate Tribunal3[TRIBUNAL] dated 6th March, 2026, disposing of two appeals4[Appeal No.654 of 2021 and Appeal No.527 of 2021]. Appeal No. 654 of 2021 was the instance of Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited5[KOTAK AMC], assailing an order dated 27th August 2021 of the Whole Time Member6[WTM or Member, used interchangeably] of the Securities and Exchange Board of India7[SEBI] whereas, the appellants in Appeal No. 527 of 2022 were Kotak Mahindra Trustee Company Limited8[KOTAK TRUSTEE] and its employees/officers/senior executives/fund managers9[Nilesh Shah; Lakshmi Iyer; Deepak Agarwal; Jolly Bhatt; Abhishek Bisen; Gaurang Shah (collectively, Senior Executives)], collectively, wherein they assailed an order dated 30th June, 2022 passed by the Adjudicating Officer10[AO], SEBI.

GENESIS OF THE LIS

3. The facts, shorn of unnecessary details, are:

    a. A mutual fund by the name of Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund11[KOTAK MF or KOTAK MUTUAL FUND, used interchangeably] was sponsored by Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited12[KOTAK BANK]. The funds thereof were held by KOTAK TRUSTEE in a fiduciary capacity. KOTAK TRUSTEE appointed KOTAK AMC (a wholly owned subsidiary of KOTAK BANK) as the asset management company to manage the funds of KOTAK MF.

b. KOTAK MF launched 6 close ended schemes13[FMP series nos. 127, 183, 187, 189, 193 and 194; collectively referred as ‘Schemes’] (a scheme having a fixed maturity period) between 2013 and 2016 which were to mature in or around April/May 201914[FMP Series 127 had maturity date of 8th April, 2019, FMP Series 183 had maturity date of 10th April, 2019; FMP Series 187 had maturity date of 15th April, 2019; FMP Series 189 had maturity date of 22nd April, 2019; FMP Series 193 had maturity date of 2nd May, 2019; FMP Series 194 had maturity date of 15th May, 2019.]. Accordingly, KOTAK AMC was to invest only in such securities which would mature on or before the date of the maturity of the scheme15[see: Circular SEBI/IMD/CIR No. 12/147132/08 dated 11th December, 2008]. The Schemes were regulated by the SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 199616[1996 Regulations]. As per the 1996 Regulations, the scheme must be wound up at the end of the maturity period.

c. An amount of Rs. 266 crore (out of Rs. 1625 crore) collected under the said Schemes was invested in debt securities, i.e., Zero Coupon Non-Convertible Debentures17[ZCNCDs] issued by Konti Infrapower & Multiventures Private Limited18[KONTI] and Edison Utility Works Private Limited19[EDISON] (parts of the ESSEL group of companies20[ESSEL]). These investments were backed by a pledge over 22.8% shares of Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited21[ZEEL], which were owned by Cyquator Media Services Private Limited22[CYQUATOR]. Amount of the shares pledged by CYQUATOR was to the extent of 1.5 times of the exposure amount, which was to be topped up by CYQUATOR by giving additional security (additional shares or otherwise) in case of drop in share cover below 1.5 times.

d. The ZCNCDs were to mature on 8th April, 2019, which was on the maturity date of one of the 6 Schemes and prior to maturity of the remaining 5.

e. On 13th November, 2018, ZEEL made a public disclosure expressing its intent to divest 50% of its shareholding. This, along with invocation of pledge by other lenders of ZEEL, caused a drop in the share value of ZEEL, resulting in the security cover to drop below 1.5 tim

            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
            1
            2
            3
            4
            5
            6
            7
            8
            9
            10
            11
            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
            supreme today icon
            logo-black

            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

            Please visit our Training & Support
            Center or Contact Us for assistance

            qr

            Scan Me!

            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

            whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
            whatsapp-icon Back to top