SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(SC) 886

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
VIKRAM NATH, SANDEEP MEHTA, JJ.
In Re: 2 Million Lives At Risk, Contamination In Jojari River, Rajasthan
Suo Moto Writ Petition (Civil) No(s). 8 of 2025 With Civil Appeal No(s). 5517-5519 of 2022, Civil Appeal No(s). 8748 of 2022, Civil Appeal No(s). 9057-9058 of 2022, Civil Appeal No(s). 9010-9011 of 2022
Decided On : 07-08-2026

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): By Courts Motion Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, A.A.G. Mr. Nikhil Jain, AOR Ms. Divya Jain, Adv. Ms. Arveen Sekhon, Adv. Mr. Saurabh Rajpal, AOR M/S. Aura & Co., AOR
For the Respondent(s):Mr. S.V Raju, A.S.G. Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, A.A.G. Mr. Saurabh Rajpal, AOR Ms. Arushi Rathore, Adv. Mrs. Archana Pathak Dave, A.S.G. Mr. Sudarshan Lamba, AOR Ms. Harshita Choubey, Adv. Mr. Aditya Shankar Dixit, Adv. Mr. Udit Dedhiya, Adv. Mr. Varun Chug, Adv. Ms. Archna Pathak Dave, A.S.G. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Ms. Harshita Choubey, Adv. Mr. Aditya Dixit, Adv. Mr. Udit Dediya, Adv. Mr. Varun Chugh, Adv. Mr. Rohan Gupta, Adv. Mr. Avishkar Singhvi, Adv. Mr. Neil Chatterjee, Adv. Mr. Abhinav Srivastav, Adv. Mr. Utsav Saxena, Adv. Ms. Ria Bansal, Adv. M/S. Trilegal Advocates On Record, AOR Mr. K. Paari Vendhan, AOR Mr. Rishabh Sancheti, Adv. Ms. Padma Priya, Adv. Mr. Digvijay Singh, Adv. Mr. Nishant Kumar, Adv. Mr. Aquib Ali Khan, Adv. Ms. Poornima Gupta, Adv. Mr. Dhaval Gaur, Adv. Mr. Milind Kumar, AOR Ms. Sapna Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Bhuvnesh Vyas, Adv. Mr. Jatin Arora, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Praveen Acharya, AOR Mr. Avijit Roy, AOR Mr. Vinay Kothari, Adv. Mr. Mehul Kothari, Adv. Ms. Mahima Pandey, Adv. Mr. Alabhya Dhamija, AOR Mr. Azmat Hayat Amanullah, AOR Mr. Arpit Gupta, AOR Mr. Chandrika Prasad Mishra, AOR Ms. Prashasti Singh, Adv. Mr. Ankit Pandey, Adv. Ms. Swati Surbhi, Adv. Ms. Harshita Bhardwaj, Adv. Ms. Anushree Singh, Adv. Mr. Nishant Awana, AOR Mr. Sarvesh Bisaria, Adv. Mr. Prakash Chandra Sharma, Adv. Mr. Nishant Bhardwaj, AOR Mr. Raghunatha Sethupathy B, AOR Mr. K. Paari Vendhan, AOR Mr. Rishabh Sancheti, Adv. Ms. Padma Priya, Adv. Mr. Digvijay Singh, Adv. Mr. Nishant Kumar, Adv. Mr. Aquib Ali Khan, Adv. Ms. Poornima Gupta, Adv. Mr. Dhaval Gaur, Adv.
.

ORDER :

Sandeep Mehta, J.

1. This Court, vide order dated 21st July, 2026, took on record the Second Status Report submitted by the High-Level Ecosystem Oversight Committee1[Hereinafter, being referred to as the “Committee”.], along with its comments on the First Status Report of the Special Investigation Team.2[Hereinafter, being referred to as the “SIT”.] During the course of the hearing, this Court also handed over to Mr. S.V. Raju, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the State of Rajasthan, copies of certain newspaper reports highlighting matters of grave environmental concern across different regions of the State. Upon consideration of the Committee’s reports and the aforesaid newspaper reports, this Court noted prima facie material disclosing grave environmental concerns, including widespread contamination of water bodies, discharge of untreated industrial effluents, degradation of groundwater, agricultural lands and wildlife habitats, possible encroachments upon riverbeds and floodplains, deficiencies in the identification of High Flood Line and buffer zones, and ex facie systemic failures in regulatory enforcement. The Committee had also highlighted issues concerning ecological restoration, protection of riverine ecosystems, strengthening of the institutional framework governing river basin management, and the functioning of the Common Effluent Treatment Plant (CETP), Sangariya, warranting immediate attention.

2. Having regard to the seriousness and emergent nature of the issues brought to its notice, this Court issued a series of interim directions, inter alia, permitting the Committee to examine representations of White Category industries for appropriate relief; directing the State of Rajasthan to facilitate transfer of identified lands to the Forest Department for ecological restoration; requiring the Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board3[For short, “RSPCB”.] to prepare and implement, under the Committee’s supervision, a scientific plan for the treatment and safe disposal of the accumulated effluents at CETP, Sangariya without permitting resumption of industrial operations; and directing the State to file comprehensive affidavits responding to the Committee’s findings and the environmental concerns reflected in the newspaper reports. The Court further required the State to explain the non-invocation of graver penal provisions in environmental prosecutions, directed immediate consideration of such offences particularly those under Sections 272, 326(a), and 326(c) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and for offences punishable under the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 in pending and future cases, made the Chief Secretary personally responsible for ensuring compliance with the Court’s directions, and directed his appearance through virtual mode on the next date of hearing.

3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order dated 21st July, 2026, the State of Rajasthan has placed on record (i) a Report of the Special Investigation Team in compliance with the directions issued by this Court; and (ii) a comprehensive Compliance Report on behalf of the State, detailing the steps taken in furtherance of the directions contained in the aforesaid order. The State has also brought on record the factual position, after due verification, with regard to the newspaper reports handed over to the learned Additional Solicitor General during the course of the previous hearing, including the action taken by the concerned authorities, the responsibility, if any, fixed, and the remedial measures proposed to address the environmental concerns highlighted therein. The reports further set out the progress made by the State authorities in implementing the directions issued by this Court and the measures undertaken towards ensuring compliance with the previous order.

4. We have carefully perused the Report submitted by the SIT. The Report indicates that the SIT has undertaken a comprehensive review of 16 criminal cases relati

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top