SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 58

V.V.S.RAO
Valluri Anuradha – Appellant
Versus
Sub-Registrar, Saroornagar, R. R. District – Respondent


( 1 ) THE Writ petition No. 484 of 2006 is filed by three petitioners. The first petitioner is mother of petitioners 2 and 3. The second petitioner in this writ petition filed another writ petition separately being W. P. No. 483 of 2006. The mother and two daughters filed the writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1 and 3 in executing the cancellation deed bearing document No. 6330/2005, dated 22. 12. 2005 as illegal and arbitrary and for a consequential order restraining the respondents from alienating, transferring and conveying the house bearing No. 13-54/1, plot no. 14, Survey No. 221, situated at Pandt colony, Gaddiannaram village (hereafter called, the house ). The second writ petition being W. P. No. 483 of 2006 is filed for a similar relief in respect of another cancellation deed bearing document No. 6329/ 2005, dated 22. 12. 2005, executed by third respondent. Be it noted, the respondents in both the writ petitions are same and the third respondent is none other than the husband of the first petitioner and father of petitioners 2 and 3, as alleged in the writ petition. For the purpose of this order, the parties are referred to by








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top