SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 112

J.CHELAMESWAR, M.E.N.PATRUDU
Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, A. P. , Hyderabad – Appellant
Versus
T. Bhaskar Rao – Respondent


M. E. N. PATRUDU, J, J.

( 1 ) PRAYER the petitioner is questioning the legality and correctness of the impugned order of the Administrative Tribunal of the State, (hereinafter referred as tribunal ) in O. A. No. 4461 of 2003, dated 28. 1. 2005. Impugned order

( 2 ) TO consider the case of the respondent for promotion to the post of superintendent without reference to the charge memo, with all consequential benefits. Facts

( 3 ) THE facts to the extent necessary are:

( 4 ) THE Principal Chief Conservator of forests, Andhra Pradesh the petitioner herein is the respondent in the O. A.

( 5 ) MR. T. Bhaskar Rao, a Senior assistant in the Forest Range Office of adilabad, the respondent herein is the applicant in the O. A.

( 6 ) THE petitioner vide Rc. No. 21904/ 2002/p1, dated 20. 11. 2002 issued a charge memo to the respondent and placed him under suspension on an allegation that the respondent was negligent in making entries in the cash register without proper scrutiny.

( 7 ) THE respondent submitted his explanation on 31. 12. 2002.

( 8 ) THEREAFTER, the suspension of the respondent was revoked and was reinstated to duty without prejudice to the disciplinary proceedings which were already





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top