( 1 ) THIS Court ordered notice before admission on 11-11-2005. Sri A. Ravinder, the learned counsel who had lodged caveat on behalf of the Court auction purchaser-R. 2, had taken notice. On behalf of R. 1-decree holder, Sri K. V. Subramanya Narsu, the learned counsel had entered appearance. While ordering notice before admission on 11-11-2005 this Court also made the following order. Both the learned counsel have brought to my notice that E. P. No. 239 of 1998 has been posted for delivering of open plot on 14-11-2005. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, smt. M. Bhaskara Laxmi, the petitioner is very much residing in the building built in the open plot. In these circumstances, the Court below is directed to proceed further with the delivery proceedings and the delivery of the open plot shall be handed over to the auction purchaser without disturbing the possession of the petitioner herein in the construction made in the said plot". At the request of the counsel on record, the matter is being adjourned from time to time and ultimately, the C. R. P itself is finally heard.

( 2 ) THE C. R. P. is preferred by the revision petitioner judgment debtor No. 2 under article

Click Here to Read the rest of this document