SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 185

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
D. Neetha – Appellant
Versus
Joint Collector, Nizamabad – Respondent


( 1 ) THE Revenue Divisional officer, Nizamabad, the 2nd respondent herein, issued notification, calling tor applications for appointment of Dealers to various Fair Price Shops, in Nizamabad town. The petitioner submitted her application. The 2nd respondent appointed the petitioner as dealer, for shop No. 71. The petitioner was issued authorization, by the competent authority on 12-4-1994. Respondents 5 to 10 herein, who were not selected for any Fair Price Shop, filed an appeal before the Joint Collector, Nizamabad, the 1st respondent, challenging the appointment of dealers to various Fair Price shops. The selected candidates were not made parties in the appeal. Through his order dated 20-2-1995, the 1st respondent allowed the appeal and set aside the appointment of the petitioner as well as several other dealers. He directed the 2nd respondent to conduct a test and select the candidates for the respective shops, on merits.

( 2 ) PETITIONER filed W. P. No. 4509 of 1995 before this Court, challenging the order dated 20-2-1995, passed by the 1st respondent. The writ petition was allowed on 26-9-1995, on the sole ground that the petitioner herein was not made a party, in the appeal b









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top