SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 174

C.V.RAMULU
Varanasi Vital Rao – Appellant
Versus
Jallepalli Janardhanarao – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS Civil Revision Petition is filed under article 227 of the Constitution of India being aggrieved by an Orderdated 23-12-2004 made in IAG R No. 3530 of 2004 in cross-objections in A. S. No. 81 of 2004 on the file of the learned i Additional District Judge, Srikakulam.

( 2 ) THE petitioner is the 1st respondent in the above appeal and plaintiff in O. S. No. 126 of 2004 on the file of the learned Junior Civil judge, Amudalavalasa. Respondent No. 1 herein is the appellant in the above appeal and 2nd defendant in the suit. Respondent No. 2 is the 2nd respondent in the appeal and 1st defendant in the suit. The parties are here in after referred to as they were arrayed in the suit.

( 3 ) THE plaintiff (petitioner herein) laid a suit for recovery of certain amount on the foot of a promissory note. The suit was decreed as against the 2nd defendant and was dismissed as against the 1st defendant, father of the 2nd defendant, on the ground that his signature was forged. Defendant No. 2 carried the matter in appeal being A. S. No. 81 of 2004 on the file of the learned I Additional District Judge, srikakulam being aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree made in O. S. No. 126 of 2004 on th



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top