SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 150

B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, D.S.R.VERMA
Sai Priya Construction Company – Appellant
Versus
K. Anantha Kumari Satya Raju – Respondent


D. S. R. VARMA, J.

( 1 ) HEARD both sides.

( 2 ) THOUGH the matter is listed under the caption "interlocutory", with the consent of both the learned counsel, the Civil miscellaneous Appeal itself is disposed of by this judgment.

( 3 ) THE present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, under Section 37 of the Arbitration and conciliation Act, 1996 (for brevity "the Act"), is directed against the order, dt. 11-7-2005, passed by the XII Additional Chief Judge, city Civil Court, Hyderabad (Fast Track court), dismissing the Arbitration o P. No. 1031 of 2003 as not maintainable.

( 4 ) THE appellant is the builder and the respondents are the owners of disputed property.

( 5 ) FOR the sake of convenience, in this judgment, the appellant and the respondents will be referred to as "the builder" and "the owners" respectively.

( 6 ) THE backdrop, in brief, appears to be that there was an agreement between the builder and the owners to develop the land of the owners bearing Plot Nos. 5 and 6, situated chikoti Gardens, Hyderabad. The said agreement is dated 25-1-12001. Later, the owners cancelled the agreement on 18-7-2002, and the builder was informed of the same by way of a notice on 27-7-2002. Aggrieved






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top