B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, D.S.R.VERMA
Sai Priya Construction Company – Appellant
Versus
K. Anantha Kumari Satya Raju – Respondent
( 1 ) HEARD both sides.
( 2 ) THOUGH the matter is listed under the caption "interlocutory", with the consent of both the learned counsel, the Civil miscellaneous Appeal itself is disposed of by this judgment.
( 3 ) THE present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, under Section 37 of the Arbitration and conciliation Act, 1996 (for brevity "the Act"), is directed against the order, dt. 11-7-2005, passed by the XII Additional Chief Judge, city Civil Court, Hyderabad (Fast Track court), dismissing the Arbitration o P. No. 1031 of 2003 as not maintainable.
( 4 ) THE appellant is the builder and the respondents are the owners of disputed property.
( 5 ) FOR the sake of convenience, in this judgment, the appellant and the respondents will be referred to as "the builder" and "the owners" respectively.
( 6 ) THE backdrop, in brief, appears to be that there was an agreement between the builder and the owners to develop the land of the owners bearing Plot Nos. 5 and 6, situated chikoti Gardens, Hyderabad. The said agreement is dated 25-1-12001. Later, the owners cancelled the agreement on 18-7-2002, and the builder was informed of the same by way of a notice on 27-7-2002. Aggrieved
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.