( 1 ) THIS Court ordered Notice before Admission on 31-1-2006 and granted interim stay for a limited period. Sri B. Vijaysen Reddy, learned Counsel representing the respondents-defendants, entered appearance.

( 2 ) SRI T. Koteswara Prasad, learned counsel representing the petitioner-plaintiff would maintain that in the facts and circumstances of the case the learned I additional District Judge, Warangal had committed an error in declining permission to the petitioner to file the document, i. e. , the certified copy of the registered Will deed bearing Doc. No. 16/1964 dated 10-8-1964 executed by Sri Varadarajulu, and mark the same as an exhibit. The learned Counsel would also maintain that in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, initially by mistake it was mentioned that the original is in the "public office", but, however, in the additional affidavit, the same was clarified and it was specifically stated at Paragraph 5 that neither the petitioner nor the respondents are the beneficiaries under the Will and the original was with the legal heirs of varadarjulu and they also died and as such she is unable to produce the original. The learned Counsel would also maintain that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document