( 1 ) THE revision petitioners are the legal representatives of the plaintiff, one g. Sanjeeva Reddy, who filed the suit o. S. No. 341 of 1987 now on the file of the court of Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kadiri for injunctive relief against the respondents herein, in respect of the suit schedule property. The original plaintiff died and the plaintiffs 2 to 5 were brought on record as legal representatives of the deceased-sole plaintiff. The 3rd petitioner herein filed I. A. No. 2 of 2003 in the suit purportedly under Order VII rule 14 (3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short "the CPC") seeking leave of the Court to file a certified copy of the 10-1 revenue record.

( 2 ) IN the affidavit filed in support of I. A. No. 2 of 2003 the 3rd petitioner herein pleaded that the claim in the plaint is that the plaintiffs are in exclusive possession and enjoyment of the suit property; that the defendants have denied the plaint plea; that as the original plaintiff-the father of the deponent of I. A. No. 2 of 2003 was looking after the litigation, the deponent had no earlier knowledge about a mutation proceedings that had occurred resulting in an entry in the 10-1 extract; and that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document