SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 331

D.S.R.VERMA, B.SESHASAYANA REDDY
Chiranjeevi – Appellant
Versus
Lavanya @ Sujatha – Respondent


B. SESHASAYANA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is directed against the order dated 19th October, 1995 passed by the Principal Subordinate Judge, ranga Reddy District at Saroornagar, hyderabad in O. P. No. 104 of 1992, where by the learned Subordinate Judge dismissed the petition filed by the appellant-husband under Section 13 (1 ) (ia) of the Hindu Marriage act, 1955.

( 2 ) THE marriage between the appellant and respondent was solemnized on 1-8-1990 at Lalaguda, Secunderabad as per hindu rites and customs. After the marriage they started living together at Goutamnagar, malkajgiri. Differences arose between them within three months of their living together. It is the case of the appellant-husband that the respondent-wife used to visit her parents house without informing him or any one of the members in the joint family. On several occasions, according to the appellant husband, he warned her not to leave the house frequently, but she never cared his words. One K. Narayana, a retired Police officer working as Special Judicial Second class Magistrate, ill-advised the respondent wife and thereby respondent-wife became more and more adamant and behaved rashly and she even




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top