SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 367

B.PRAKASH RAO, D.APPA RAO
Mohd. Abdul Razak – Appellant
Versus
B. Venkatesh @ Venkataiah – Respondent


D. APPARAO, J.

( 1 ) THE unsuccessful plaintiff in O. S. 189/98 on the file of the learned II Additional District judge, R. R. District, filed this appeal against the decree and judgment dated 28-2-2003 dismissing the suit filed for specific performance of an oral agreement of sale.

( 2 ) THE parties are described as arrayed in the suit for felicity expression.

( 3 ) IT is the case of the plaintiff that the defendant had entered into an oral agreement of sale with him for sale of Ac. 0. 12 guntas of site viz. , 1452 sq. yards in Sy. No. 17/aa situated at Soug-Bowli village, Rajendernagar mandal, R. R. District on 26-4-1997 for a consideration of Rs. 11,00,000/-, approximately at the rate of Rs. 757-50 ps per sq. yard. He paid Rs. 1,100/- as token advance amount for which the defendant gave receipt under ex. A-1. Again on 30-4-1997 he paid rs. 10,000/- to the defendant under Ex. A-2 receipt. The defendant agreed that on receiving balance of sale consideration before Sub Registrar at the time of registration, he would execute a registered sale deed. In the month of May, 1997 when they went to the suit land forpurpose of measuring the land, the defendant informed thatthere was a bound



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top