V.V.S.RAO
Murtaza Moosavi – Appellant
Versus
Hemendra. V. Shah – Respondent
( 2 ) THE brief fact of the matter leading to filing of the civil revision petition is as follows.
( 3 ) THE first respondent here in filed a rent control case being R. C. No. 399 of 2000 under the provisions of A. P. Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 against the petitioner herein and second respondent on the ground of default in payment of rent, subletting, bona fide requirement and wastage of the property. During the enquiry, the first respondent as P. W. 1 admitted that his clerk (Rent Collector) used to maintain registers and make entries of the rents received. Therefore, the petitioner here in filed an application being I. A. No. 132 of 2002 under order XI Rule 14 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) seeking a direction to the first respondent herein to produce the register showing the alleged collection of rents. The first respondent filed counter affidavit stating that Rajeswara Rao, the clerk,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.