SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 438

V.V.S.RAO
Murtaza Moosavi – Appellant
Versus
Hemendra. V. Shah – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS civil revision petition is filed under article 227 of Constitution of India by the petitioner aggrieved by the order dated 25-8-2004 in I. A. No. 78 of 2003 in R. C. No. 399 of 2000 on the file of the Court of II Additional rent Controller, Hyderabad.

( 2 ) THE brief fact of the matter leading to filing of the civil revision petition is as follows.

( 3 ) THE first respondent here in filed a rent control case being R. C. No. 399 of 2000 under the provisions of A. P. Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 against the petitioner herein and second respondent on the ground of default in payment of rent, subletting, bona fide requirement and wastage of the property. During the enquiry, the first respondent as P. W. 1 admitted that his clerk (Rent Collector) used to maintain registers and make entries of the rents received. Therefore, the petitioner here in filed an application being I. A. No. 132 of 2002 under order XI Rule 14 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) seeking a direction to the first respondent herein to produce the register showing the alleged collection of rents. The first respondent filed counter affidavit stating that Rajeswara Rao, the clerk,






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top