P. YERRAM NAIDU, J.

( 1 ) WRIT petitioner, had moved this Court questioning the surcharge order issued by 1st respondent in proceedings Rc. No. 882/ 94-B, dated 31-12-1996 for surcharging an amount of Rs. 9,692/- from the petitioner along with interest which is illegal, arbitrary, contrary to Section 51 of the A. P. Cooperative societies Act, 1964, hereinafter in short referred to as "act" for the purpose of convenience, and violative of article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequentially direct the respondents to provide all the necessary documents to the petitioner on which the authorities relied and to pass such other suitable orders.

( 2 ) SRI Siva Prasad, the learned counsel representing the petitioner would contend that the report was not placed before the General Body as per Section 51 of the Act and the said provision being mandatory, the proceedings are liable to be quashed. The learned Counsel also would submit that no doubt initially interim suspension was granted but subsequent thereto by virtue of modification the entire amount was directed to be deposited and the writ petitioner had already deposited the amount. The learned Counsel also would submit that thoug

Click Here to Read the rest of this document