SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(AP) 49

G.ROHINI
Sarihaddu Ramya – Appellant
Versus
Gudivada Rural Mandal Parishad, Gudivada, Krishna Dist – Respondent


G. ROHINI, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari calling for the records relating to the order dated 14-10-2004 in o. P. No. 83 of 2001 on the file of the election Tribunal-cum-Senior Civil Judge, gudiwada and to quash the same being arbitrary, illegal and without jurisdiction.

( 2 ) THE facts, which are not in dispute, are as under:

( 3 ) IN the election held on 15-7-2001 for the Mandal Parishad Territorial constituency (M. P. T. C.) of Serivelpur, the petitioner was elected as a Member of the said M. P. T. C. Later, she was also elected as President of Mandal Praja parishad. The third respondent herein, who was an unsuccessful candidate, filed o. P. No. 83 of 2001 on the file of the election Tribunal-cum-Senior Civil Judge, gudiwada, seeking a declaration that the writ petitioner was disqualified on the ground that she has not completed the age of 21 years on the date of filing of the nomination. The writ petitioner, who was arrayed as the first respondent in the O. P. No. 83 of 2001, filed a counter denying the allegations. Both the parties let in oral and documentary evidence in support of their respective pleas. The Tribunal, on appreciation of the evidence on recor

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top