SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(AP) 125

G.ROHINI
Bandila Audi Seshamma – Appellant
Versus
Government Of A. P. – Respondent


G. ROHINI, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner was elected as President of the Mandal Parishad, chillakur Mandal on 22-7-2001.

( 2 ) THIS writ petition is filed questioning the notice dated 5-1-2005 issued by the 2nd respondent-Revenue Divisional Officer, gudur proposing to convene the meeting of mandal Parishad on 3-2-2005 at 11. 00 a. m. , to consider the Motion of No Confidence against the petitioner on the basis of a notice received from 10 members of the mandal Parishad informing that they intend to make a motion expressing want of confidence in the President of the Mandal parishad.

( 3 ) THE petitioner contends that the impugned notice is not in conformity with the provisions of Section 245 of the a. P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 (for short, the Act ) read with Rule 2 of the Rules made under G. O. Ms. No. 200, PRandrd, dated 28-4-1998 and therefore the entire proceedings are liable to be declared as invalid.

( 4 ) IT is not in dispute that the impugned notice was issued in Form-V annexed to the Rules relating to Motion of no Confidence in Upa-Sarpanch of Gram panchayat or Vice-President, President of mandal Parishad or Vice-Chairperson/ chairperson of Zilla Parishad (for short, the rules )















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top