SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(AP) 205

G.YETHIRAJULU
Gaddam China Dodamma – Appellant
Versus
Goka Pedda Dodamma – Respondent


G. YETHIRAJULU, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is preferred by the first defendant in O. S. No. 1 of 1997 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Adilabad. The first respondent - plaintiff filed O. S. No. 1 of 1997 for partition of the suit property into two equal shares between the plaintiff and the first defendant and to allot one such share to the plaintiff. The suit was dismissed by the trial court through its judgment dated 9-11-1998. The plaintiff being aggrieved by the judgment of the trial Court preferred a. S. No. 3 of 1999 before the Additional district Judge, Adilabad. The appellate court allowed the appeal through the judgment dated 23-1-2002 by setting aside the judgment and decree of the trial Court and decreeing the suit as prayed for. The first defendant being aggrieved by the judgment and decree of the first appellate Court preferred this second appeal challenging the validity and legality of the decree granted by the first appellate Court.

( 2 ) WHEN the matter came up for admission before this Court, notice was ordered to the respondents 1 and 2 and the first respondent - first defendant made appearance through her counsel. The notice sent to the second respondent returned u






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top