SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(AP) 254

GOPALA KRISHNAN NAIR, ELIPE DHARMA RAO
SUBBALAKSHMI – Appellant
Versus
R. PALANI SWAMY – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS Civil Revision Petition is filed under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The petitioner herein, who seeks to assail the docket order dated 22-11-2004 passed in. A. No. 1133 of 2004 in O. P. No. 235 of 2000 on the file of the Court of Motor accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-District judge, Chittoor, granting permission to withdraw a sum of Rs. 30,000-00 as against her share amount of Rs. 84,725-00.

( 2 ) MR. T. C. KRISHNAN, the learned counsel appearing for the Revision Petitioner submitted that the Claims Tribunal ought to have allowed the application in toto but the claims Tribunal committed illegality in allowing the Interlocutory application in part, having convinced with the material available on record, permitted the petitioner to withdraw Rs. 30,000-00 and directed to fix (sic. keep) the balance amount in FD for a period of one year. The Revision Petitioner submitted before the Claims Tribunal that due to severe drought conditions prevailing for the last five years she incurred several debts and also the amount lying in the fixed deposit is very much necessary to construct a house in the place of dilapidated tiled house.

( 3 ) THE learned counsel for the Revi






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top