( 1 ) THE petitioner is the sole Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. PC ). accused in C. C. No. 332 of 2001. The charge Be that as it is, after completion of the against her is that she committed offences evidence, when the matter was coming up under Sections 27 and 64 of the Indian for examination of accused under Section stamp ACT, 1899, 1989. She is a resident of 313 of Cr. PC. , she filed a petition being chennai. Before Trial Court, from the Cri. M. P. No. 116 of 2005 before the learned beginning she was represented by a lawyer Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, for the purpose of Sections 205 and 251 of Bobbili under proviso to Section 313 (1) of cr. PC praying to dispense with her personal attendance and permit her advocate to answer questions under Section 313 of cr. PC. The said petition was returned by the learned Magistrate on 24-1-2005 on the ground that N. B. W. against the petitioner is pending.

( 2 ) IN this petition filed under section 482 of Cr. PC. , the petitioner made two prayers, one is to quash N. B. W. issued to the petitioner on 24-1-2005 and the other is to permit the duly instructed petitioner s counsel to answer questions und