B.PRAKASH RAO
Gandham Vajramma – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Survey, Settlements and land Records, Hyderabad – Respondent
( 1 ) HEARD Sri A. Rangacharyulu, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue (General) appearing on behalf of the respondents.
( 2 ) SINCE common questions are involved in all these writ petitions, the same are being taken up together for disposal.
( 3 ) THE main point which arises for an adjudication in all these cases is as to whether the provision for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act is applicable to the proceedings under the a. P. (Andhra Area) Estates (Abolition and conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1948 ?
( 4 ) THE few facts which are necessary for disposal of these cases are that the petitioners herein filed applications under section 11 (a) of the A. P. (Andhra Area) estates (Abolition and Conversion into ryotwari) Act, 1948 (for short the Act ) seeking for grant of patta which was initially negatived. Against which, they filed appeals before the first respondent herein with applications under Section 5 of the limitation Act for condonation of delay in filing thereof. The main ground urged on behalf of the petitioners was that having regard to the fact that possession is
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.