( 1 ) THE revision petitioner are Accused Nos. 2 and 4 in Calendar Case No. 30 of 1994 on the file of the Court of IX Metropolitan Magistrate, hyderabad. They along with Accused Nos. 1, 3, 5 and 6 were arraigned for offences punishable under Sections 120-B, 420, 406 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The trial Court convicted all of them for offences under Section, 120-B, 420, 406 and 411 of i. P. C. and recorded different sentences for the several accused. Aggrieved, the revision petitioners A-2 and A-4 filed Criminal Appeal no. 130 of 2001 before the Metropolitan sessions Judge, Hyderabad. in the appeal, the State filedcrl. M. P. No. 1292 of 2002 under section 391 of Cr. P. C. for receiving additional evidence, namely, the question-cum-answer papers attached to Exs. P-81 to P-84 by examining Investigation Officer-P. W. 48 after recalling him. This application of the State was allowed by the order dated 14-11 -2002, where against this revision is filed.

( 2 ) BY the order impugned, the Court below recorded that A-3 and A-4 had indisputably appeared fortheeamcet-1993 examination at Nellore; that during the process of investigation, xerox copies of answer scrip