SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(AP) 337

T.MEENA KUMARI, G.YETHIRAJULU
Union of India, rep. by General Manager South Central Railway – Appellant
Versus
Satyanarayana Construction Co. – Respondent


T. MEENA KUMARI, J.

( 1 ) THIS CMA is filed questioning the order and decree dated 4-7-2002 passed in OP no. 77 of 2001 by the learned I Addl. Chief judge, CCC, Secunderabad wherein the OP filed by the appellants herein against the award of the second respondent dated 31-12-2000 has been dismissed confirming the said award.

( 2 ) THE case of the appellants, as projected in the OP, is as follows: the appellants called for open tenders for the earth work from Ch. 24150 M to ch. 27700 M between Dharur rukmapur stations in connection with doubling of tracks between Vikarabad and Tandur Sections and the first respondent submitted his tender for the said offer and the tender was finalized in strict conformity of the guidelines issued. It is stated that the said work has to be completed by 5-5-1997. Accordingly, an agreement was entered into and the parties accepted the same.

( 3 ) THE nature of the work includes the I ft er works as the variation quantities in the name stretch by the predecessor Contractor m. Y. J. Venkata Rao in the two contracts and that variation in the quantities was occurred due to the revision of alignment effected for easing as well as elimination of a few curves.












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top