SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(AP) 412

V.ESWARAIAH
K. Penchal Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Special Chief Secretary to Govt, Revenue (Excise-III) Dept, Government Of A. P. – Respondent


V. ESWARAIAH, J.

( 1 ) HEARD the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, Government pleader for Prohibition and Excise and the learned Counsel appearing for the fourth respondent.

( 2 ) THE undisputed facts of the case are that the fourth respondent was granted licence in Form IL 24 for the Excise Year 1997-98 in the name and style of M/s. Sreenivasa Wines at Somasila, Nellore district The Prohibition and Excise Inspector, atmakur, along with his staff conducted inspection at the shop of the fourth respondent and a case was registered on 14. 5. 1998 for the offence under Section 36 (c) of the Andhra Pradesh Excise Act, 1968 (for short the Act ) for conducting loose sales, which is in contravention of the terms and conditions of the licence and Rule 23 (xiii) of the Andhra Pradesh Indian Liquor and Foreign Liquor Rules, 1970 (for short the Rules ). Pursuant to that the authorities passed orders suspending his licence on 16. 5. 1998 and the fourth respondent filed W. P. No. 14479 of 1998 challenging the suspension order, which was disposed of on 28. 5. 1998 directing conduct of enquiry under the provisions of the Act and take appropriate action in accordance with law. Accordi






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top