L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Rukya Bee – Appellant
Versus
Syed Afzal – Respondent
( 1 ) THE plaintiffs in O. S. No. 170 of 1991, on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Zaheerabad, are the petitioners herein. They challenge the order dated 11-10-2004 passed by the trial Court, impleading the first petitioner (sic. respondent) herein as one of the parties to the suit.
( 2 ) THE suit was filed by the petitioners herein for the relief of partition and separate possession of the suit schedule property against the respondents 2 to 5 herein, the defendants. A preliminary decree was passed on 19-7-1995, directing that the petitioners on the one hand, and the respondents 2 to 5 on the other hand, shall be entitled to two equal shares in the suit schedule property. The respondents 2 to 5 herein filed A. S. No. 32 of 1995, in the Court of District Judge, Medak at Sanaareddy, and it was dismissed on 25-8-2000. Aggrieved by the same, the respondents 2 to 5 filed S. A. No. 129 of 2001, and it was also dismissed by this Court on 8-2-2002 Thereafter, the petitioners filed i. A. No. 43 of 2003, in the trial Court, praying for final decree.
( 3 ) AT that stage, the first respondent filed I. A. No. 59 of 2004, under Order 1 Rule 10 C. P. C. , with a prayer to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.