SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(AP) 512

M.VENKATESWARA REDDY
Gajamker Narayana – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS Criminal Revision Case is filed against the judgment dated 02-06-2001 passed in crl. A. No. 77 of 1998 on the file of the additional Sessions Judge, Medak at sangareddy, confirming the conviction and sentence of six months simple imprisonment and fine of Rs. 5,000/- imposed by the Judicial magistrate of First Class, Special Court for prohibition and Excise Offences, sangareddy, for the offence under section 8 (b)of the A. P. Prohibition Act, 1995.

( 2 ) THE case of the prosecution is that on 03-09-1995, at Rangadampally village, the excise Officials apprehended the accused as he was found in possession of a plastic can containing 10 litres of I. D. liquor. The same was seized in the presence of panchas under the cover of Panchanama, Ex. P-1, after drawing samples. On analysis, the contents were found to be I. D. Liquor. Therefore, the accused was charge-sheeted for the offence punishable under Sec. 34 (a) of the A. P. Excise Act and Section 8 (b) of a. P. Prohibition Fraught Act, 1995. In support of the case of prosecution, P. Ws. 1 to 3 were examined and Exs. P-1 to P-5 were marked. The trial Court after consideration of the material on record found him guilty of the of






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top