SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(AP) 479

V.V.S.RAO
Alluri Sitaram Raju – Appellant
Versus
Kandregula Varaha Sankar Nageswara Rao – Respondent


( 1 ) PUBLIC Prosecutor, on behalf of Respondent No. 2. The petitioners are accused Nos. 1 and 6 in C. C. No. 685 of 2001. They are the Directors of M/s. Visakha Aqua Farms Limited, which is a Private Limited Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956. They filed the present petition under Section 482 of code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. P. C. ). They pray this Court to quash the criminal case in C. C. No. 685 of 2001 on the file of the court of the Additional Judicial Magistrate of first Class, Yelamanchili, Visakhapatnam district.

( 2 ) THE first respondent herein filed a private complaint before the Court of Additional judicial Magistrate of First Class, Yelamachili alleging as follows. The wife of first respondent purchased land admeasuring Acs. 3. 41, which is a middle part of the total extent of Acs. 10. 22 in Survey No. 364/a of Gudivada village, S. Rayavaram Mandal under registered sale deed. After the said purchase, the first respondent is cultivating salt by raising bunds on all over the land by reason of the General power of Attorney executed in his favour by l. W. 1. The accused No. 1 to 10 are the directors of M/s. Visakha Aqua Farms limited. They threatene









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top